Government Submissions
Government Submissions
Queensland
States
Select a state
QLD Government Submissions
Our submission urges removal of the “restricted matter” classification for unowned cats and calls for humane, effective reforms including targeted desexing, microchipping, and support for carers to reduce euthanasia and improve public outcomes.
Our submission urges removal of the “restricted matter” classification for unowned cats and calls for humane, effective reforms including targeted desexing, microchipping, and support for carers to reduce euthanasia and improve public outcomes.
Our submission urges removal of the “restricted matter” classification for unowned cats and calls for humane, effective reforms including targeted desexing, microchipping, and support for carers to reduce euthanasia and improve public outcomes.
Our submission urges removal of the “restricted matter” classification for unowned cats and calls for humane, effective reforms including targeted desexing, microchipping, and support for carers to reduce euthanasia and improve public outcomes.
Current Qld laws treat unowned cats as “restricted matter,” meaning they must be killed – feeding or adopting them is a crime. This outdated approach harms cats and the people who care for them. Public feedback closes 27 October. Copy our suggested answers and submit in 5 minutes.
Current Qld laws treat unowned cats as “restricted matter,” meaning they must be killed – feeding or adopting them is a crime. This outdated approach harms cats and the people who care for them. Public feedback closes 27 October. Copy our suggested answers and submit in 5 minutes.
Current Qld laws treat unowned cats as “restricted matter,” meaning they must be killed – feeding or adopting them is a crime. This outdated approach harms cats and the people who care for them. Public feedback closes 27 October. Copy our suggested answers and submit in 5 minutes.
Current Qld laws treat unowned cats as “restricted matter,” meaning they must be killed – feeding or adopting them is a crime. This outdated approach harms cats and the people who care for them. Public feedback closes 27 October. Copy our suggested answers and submit in 5 minutes.
This submission provides recommendations on dog training, behavioural assessments, allegations of aggression and breed specific legislation
This submission provides recommendations on dog training, behavioural assessments, allegations of aggression and breed specific legislation
This submission provides recommendations on dog training, behavioural assessments, allegations of aggression and breed specific legislation
This submission provides recommendations on dog training, behavioural assessments, allegations of aggression and breed specific legislation
9 July 2017
QLD Govt.’s Review of the By-law Prohibiting the Keeping of Pets in a Lot or on Common Property
APWF argues that body corporates should not be allowed to enforce a ‘no-pets’ by-law, regardless of when or how it was adopted.
9 July 2017
QLD Govt.’s Review of the By-law Prohibiting the Keeping of Pets in a Lot or on Common Property
APWF argues that body corporates should not be allowed to enforce a ‘no-pets’ by-law, regardless of when or how it was adopted.
9 July 2017
QLD Govt.’s Review of the By-law Prohibiting the Keeping of Pets in a Lot or on Common Property
APWF argues that body corporates should not be allowed to enforce a ‘no-pets’ by-law, regardless of when or how it was adopted.
9 July 2017
QLD Govt.’s Review of the By-law Prohibiting the Keeping of Pets in a Lot or on Common Property
APWF argues that body corporates should not be allowed to enforce a ‘no-pets’ by-law, regardless of when or how it was adopted.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.