
Government Submissions
Government Submissions
Victoria
States
Select a state
VIC Government Submissions
APWF details the argument against mandated cat containment and makes the case for adoption of innovative desexing initiatives.
APWF details the argument against mandated cat containment and makes the case for adoption of innovative desexing initiatives.
APWF details the argument against mandated cat containment and makes the case for adoption of innovative desexing initiatives.
APWF details the argument against mandated cat containment and makes the case for adoption of innovative desexing initiatives.
APWF addresses the seven key themes which are crucial for the effective management and welfare of cats across the State.
APWF addresses the seven key themes which are crucial for the effective management and welfare of cats across the State.
APWF addresses the seven key themes which are crucial for the effective management and welfare of cats across the State.
APWF addresses the seven key themes which are crucial for the effective management and welfare of cats across the State.
While expressing support for the Bill, the APWF provides feedback on risks and unintended consequences based on its language and provisions.
While expressing support for the Bill, the APWF provides feedback on risks and unintended consequences based on its language and provisions.
While expressing support for the Bill, the APWF provides feedback on risks and unintended consequences based on its language and provisions.
While expressing support for the Bill, the APWF provides feedback on risks and unintended consequences based on its language and provisions.

9 June 2017
Victorian government’s review of banning unreasonable 'no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements
APWF supports a ban on ‘no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements as a good example of evidence-based legislative change.

9 June 2017
Victorian government’s review of banning unreasonable 'no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements
APWF supports a ban on ‘no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements as a good example of evidence-based legislative change.

9 June 2017
Victorian government’s review of banning unreasonable 'no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements
APWF supports a ban on ‘no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements as a good example of evidence-based legislative change.

9 June 2017
Victorian government’s review of banning unreasonable 'no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements
APWF supports a ban on ‘no pets’ clauses in tenancy agreements as a good example of evidence-based legislative change.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
© 2025 APWF · All rights reserved.